{"id":298,"date":"2020-12-23T22:38:40","date_gmt":"2020-12-24T05:38:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/?p=298"},"modified":"2020-12-23T22:38:40","modified_gmt":"2020-12-24T05:38:40","slug":"scanning-flat-positives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/?p=298","title":{"rendered":"Scanning flat positives"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In trying to archive some prints I have before they inevitably yellow, I invested in a scanner and Silverfast Ai.  They&#8217;re printed materials, so require <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/www.descreen.net\/eng\/soft\/descreen\/descreen.htm\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"http:\/\/www.descreen.net\/eng\/soft\/descreen\/descreen.htm\" target=\"_blank\">descreening<\/a>.  It&#8217;s important to scan materials that need descreening at whole multiples of the native optical resolution.  The best trade-off for mine ended up being 1280ppi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some of these prints are far larger than the scanner bed, so I scan them in multiple passes, with about 20% overlap.  Then I use photoshop to stitch them together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I discovered an unusual phenomenon in that the auto stitching mechanism sometimes had great difficulty getting a match, and when I attempted it manually it became apparent that the same sections, scanned multiple times, were different dimensions.  So the overlap(s) were not perfect copies of one another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I found literally <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/forums.anandtech.com\/threads\/dimensional-scanner-distortion.2172490\/page-2\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/forums.anandtech.com\/threads\/dimensional-scanner-distortion.2172490\/page-2\" target=\"_blank\">ONE <\/a>reference to this on the internet, so thought I&#8217;d place this information here in case that site ever goes down:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>After digging into the issue further a few days ago, it seems to be related to CCD scanners specifically, as opposed to CIS scanners, due to the particular use of a lens to transfer the image data to the CCD sensor.<\/p><p>Related Links:<br><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/www.imageaccess.de\/?page=WhitePapersCCDOrCIS&amp;lang=en\" target=\"_blank\">CCD or CIS<\/a>\u00a0(web &#8211; by the WideTEK scanner folks)<br><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scantopia.com\/Pdf\/Graphtec\/CISvsCCDver_final_Version.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">CIS vs. CCD<\/a>\u00a0(pdf brochure from Paradigm Imaging Group)<\/p><p>So it appears that the best color capturing happens with CCD, but you also get lens distortion with that. I suppose if someone is mainly scanning documents, a CIS scanner may be the way to go (in actuality, probably just fine for photos, too).<\/p><cite>Josh T. on forums.anandtech.com<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The lens distortion is not uniform, nor symmetrical.  The best option I&#8217;ve found is to use Photoshop&#8217;s Photomerge &#8220;auto&#8221;, which allows scaling, rotation and distortion (meant for photographs).  I was really hoping to be able to pull off something approaching archival quality (I calibrated and profiled the scanner), but having to distort dimensions to successfully stitch is really disappointing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I&#8217;m <em>almost <\/em>crazy enough to switch to the method of using a DSLR and macro lens, undoing lens distortion before stitching.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Almost&#8230;  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In trying to archive some prints I have before they inevitably yellow, I invested in a scanner and Silverfast Ai. They&#8217;re printed materials, so require descreening. It&#8217;s important to scan materials that need descreening at whole multiples of the native optical resolution. The best trade-off for mine ended up being 1280ppi. Some of these prints &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/?p=298\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Scanning flat positives<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=298"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":299,"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298\/revisions\/299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wiki.lillerant.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}